On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 23:58:05 -0700 Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If the current process is in a non-root memcg, then > global_dirty_limits() will consider the memcg dirty limit. > This allows different cgroups to have distinct dirty limits > which trigger direct and background writeback at different > levels. > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> This patch seems good because of straightforward implementation. I think worth to be tested in -mm tree. Thank you very much. Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
