Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> We have always been able to compile out the ns cgroup right? >> >> In which case this is not a backwards incompatible change so much >> as the permanent removal of a borked kernel feature. >> > > That's just spin ;) People whose code is dependent on the old feature > get screwed over if we remove it. Sure. I'm just really pointing out that there is a difference between changing the semantics and completely removing something. It makes the change discoverable and something you can cope with, if you so choose. Overall I agree with at transition period, just look at sys_sysctl. Bleh. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
