On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> This bit is awkward - you're storing the original value of the >> clone_children flag to report in the mount options, but this isn't >> necessarily the current state. Might it be better to not store this >> and just report the current value of the root cgroup's >> CGRP_CLONE_CHILDREN flag? >> > > Sure. Shall I do the same as the release agent mount option ? I think so - the slight problem with this new flag is that it's possible for the root cgroup to have one setting for clone_children and all its children to have a different setting. But I guess we can live with that. (Or maybe simply not make the default clone_children value a mount option, but require it to be set on the root cgroup after mounting?) Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
