On 08/18/2010 06:48 AM, Marc Aymerich wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Marc Aymerich<glicerinu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Oren Laadan<orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 08/17/2010 08:24 PM, Matt Helsley wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:33:40PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi folks, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> could anyone please point out the difference main difference >>>>> between linux-containers and openvz ? It is possible to replace >>>>> ovz by linux-containers yet ? >>>>> >>>>> thx >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> At the very least there is no kernel code in mainline for >>>> checkpoint/restart of containers at this time. We're still working on >>>> patches for that feature. So that's one major difference between >>>> "linux-containers" and openvz. >>> >>> To be fair, there is not kernel code in mainline for openvz either... >> >> >> >> really? http://wiki.openvz.org/File:Kernel_patches_stats.png >> > > sorry Oren I misunderstand your mail. It's true, there is no c/r on mainline > for openvz too. No problem, my language was not entirely unambiguous. To be precise, while openvz is a great project and contribute{s,d} a lot to the kernel, the openvz kernel - with or without c/r - is not in mainline. Oren. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
