On Thursday, August 12, 2010, Matt Helsley wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:35:43AM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > > Matt Helsley a écrit : ... > You're right, cgroup_mutex should protect against that. However presumably > that same logic applies to the first case. So again I don't think the bug > is a race. > > <snipped the remaining cases which should be the same> > > At this point I think the bug description in your patch needs to change > but the patch itself is perfect. Assuming you agree with my assessment > of the bug I think the process is: you'll rewrite the description, add -stable > maintaners to your current Cc's (since this bug is simple, exists in previous > versions, and is somewhat nasty), add: > > Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> > > and send it to Andrew Morton. Hopefully then (if not before) Paul and Li > will ack it. Actaully, I maintain the freezer, so please send it to me. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
