On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:07:43PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > If you are using /dev/cgroup/ that's nice, but I don't think that people > > are expecting a whole filesystem under a /dev/ subdirectory. > > Sure - as I said that's just for historical reasons from when we > migrated from cpusets which were traditionally mounted at /dev/cpuset, > so it involved less change. There's no particular reason to mount it > there (although having said that, what about /dev/pts and /dev/shm?). Yeah, /dev/pts and /dev/shm are long-time users of the /dev filesystem. I don't know if we want to encourage that as a mount point, do you? What are the different names you are giving to your mount points now for cgroupfs so I can get an idea of how it is used currently? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
