Quoting Louis Rilling (Louis.Rilling@xxxxxxxxxxx): > Hi Eric, > > On 12/07/10 11:09 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > This patch looks like it is working (only a small RCU issue shown below). I > couldn't try it yet though. > > I must admit that I am using a similar back-off solution in Kerrighed (not to > solve the issue of proc_flush_task(), but for one of the reasons that you stated > above: we want to be sure that all tasks of the namespace have been reaped), but > I considered it too ugly to propose it for Linux ;) > > That said, this is probably the least intrusive solution we have seen yet. Yeah I haven't had a chance to look at it in detail, but this looks right. Thanks, Eric. -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
