On 06/17, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > The task->children isn't changed until __unhash_process() which runs > after flush_proc_task(). Yes. But this is only the current implementation detail. It would be nice to cleanup the code so that EXIT_DEAD tasks are never sit in ->children list. > So we should be able to come up with > a variant of do_wait() that zap_pid_ns_processes can use that does > what we need. See above... Even if we modify do_wait() or add the new variant, how the caller can wait for EXIT_DEAD tasks? I don't think we want to modify release_task() to do __wake_up_parent() or something similar. Oleg. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
