Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > Cedric Le Goater [clg@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote: >> Hello Suka, >> >> On 04/01/2010 03:55 AM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: >> >>> Resending patches after fixing whitespace damage and the typo in >>> configure.ac. Add a section to patch-0 (below) to describe the >>> kernel build (commit-id, config tokens etc). >> we plan to mergepatch 2,3,4 in lxc mainline real soon, maybe not as such, >> but they won't be in the way anymore. For the moment, please keep 1,5,6 but >> make it one patch. no need to resend them in a scattered mode. > > Ok. Can you apply 1,5,6 to a separate branch, say usercr-v1, so its easier > for others to pull ? When I have some major changes I can resend the patches > merged up to latest LXC and maybe we can then have usercr-v2 and so on. > >>> 1. Build C/R-enabled Linux kernel >>> >>> $ cd /root >>> >>> $ git-clone git://www.linux-cr.org/pub/git/linux-cr.git linux-cr >>> >>> $ cd linux-cr >>> >>> $ git-checkout ckpt-v20-dev >>> >>> I tested with commit 3522c57a9ec6f08a129a78322318abcb4467db28 >>> as HEAD. >> we need to work on a better delivery scheme. I don't think a commit id is not >> the most efficient way to dialog when integrating components. We'd rather use >> a tarball or a patch on an identified kernel. > > Hmm, I thought we could just make a branch on the commit-id and apply > any additional patches there and build. > > I will base it on a closed-release next time like ckpt-v20-rc1 rather > than an open one like ckpt-v20-dev. The stable and -rc versions are tagged with cr-vXX[-rcY]. For example, current version is cr-v21-rc2 (both linux-cr and user-cr) Oren. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers