On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 09:38:00AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Louis Rilling (Louis.Rilling@xxxxxxxxxxx): > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 04:39:55PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Support checkpoint and restart of tasks in nested pid namespaces. At <snip> > > It would probably be safer too to use task_active_pid_ns() instead of > > task->nsproxy->pid_ns, just in case some PID namespace unsharing like proposed > > by Eric makes it to mainline. > > The task is frozen though so it shouldn't be able to unshare while being > checkpointed, right? But it's probably better code anyway. By the time it reaches checkpoint a frozen task is in the refrigerator -- most often in the signal delivery portion of syscall return. So it can't be making any new unshare/setns syscalls and any changes to the namespaces should be visible. Cheers, -Matt Helsley _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
