On 03/01/2010 10:42 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > I am of two mind about my patches. Right now they are a brilliant > proof of concept that we can name namespaces without needing a > namespace for the names of namespaces, and start to be a practical > solution to the join problem. At the same time, I'm not certain > I like a solution that requires yet more syscalls so I ask myself > is there not yet a simpler way. thinking aloud, what if you made the nsproxy a vfs_inode ? we could then mount the nsfs to do all sorts of fs operations on the object, like notifying easily its deletion. we would need to find a meaningful name, probably the inode number. one syscall (nsfd) would be required to get the nsproxy of a task (pid). you can't guess that from an inode number. C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
