On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:01:58 +0100, Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:23:09AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 22:23:40 +0100 > > Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Apply the cgroup dirty pages accounting and limiting infrastructure to > > > the opportune kernel functions. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Seems nice. > > > > Hmm. the last problem is moving account between memcg. > > > > Right ? > > Correct. This was actually the last item of the TODO list. Anyway, I'm > still considering if it's correct to move dirty pages when a task is > migrated from a cgroup to another. Currently, dirty pages just remain in > the original cgroup and are flushed depending on the original cgroup > settings. That is not totally wrong... at least moving the dirty pages > between memcgs should be optional (move_charge_at_immigrate?). > FYI, I'm planning to add file-cache and shmem/tmpfs support for move_charge feature for 2.6.35. But, hmm, it would be complicated if we try to move dirty account too. Thanks, Daisuke Nishimura. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
