Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > > > Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: >> From c4063a8976fd8eca9b8d62a12b95c3125c8471c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:25:36 -0800 >> Subject: [PATCH 4/4][user-cr] Rename libeclone.a to libcheckpoint.a >> >> Export app_restart() and usercr.h to user in a new library libcheckpoint.a. >> Until eclone() makes it into glibc, include eclone() also in this new library >> and remove the libeclone.a. > > I thought libeclone.a is also used by the test suite ? Yes and I have a todo in the patchset to fix cr-tests if/when we do end up changing the name. libeclone.a looks like a short-term name (if/when eclone() is merged in libc, the library is no longer required). libcheckpoint.a (or equivalent) has more long term need. If we are having a libcheckpoint, no point keeping libeclone around too ? Sukadev _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
