On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:58:13AM -0800, Matt Helsley wrote: <snip> > Your comments seem good. However, I do have an issue with the > idea of finding a single syslog corresponding to the netns for > a hypothetical printk in iptables. > > What happens with: > > /* in init_syslog_ns */ > clone(CLONE_SYSLOG) /* syslog_ns 1 */ > clone(CLONE_SYSLOG) /* syslog_ns 2 */ > <do something with iptables in the netns which triggers a printk> > > Even though that same printk is relevant to three "syslogs", it'll > only go to one, correct? If so, my feeling is that nsprintk > shouldn't take a syslog_ns directly. It should take some other > form of namespace and then write to the syslog of all the Sorry, I don't think I worded this clearly. "some other form" means a non-syslog_ns which is "relevant" to the printk e.g. a netns for iptables code. Cheers, -Matt Helsley _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
