Quoting Dan Smith (danms@xxxxxxxxxx): > SH> I think that's be better. Right now if we checkpoint a container > SH> with macvlan restart will be bogus, right? We're trying to avoid > SH> any cases where we can't tell, at checkpoint, that restart won't > SH> be right. > > Depends on your definition of bogus, and the situation, but okay. > > SH> What I was asking is should do_veth_message() be in drivers/net/veth.c? > > Well, we could add another ndo_* function to the net device, I guess, > but I'd be afraid we'd hit some cases where that wasn't sufficient. > Maybe it would be best to generalize that bit after I've added macvlan > (,etc) support so we have a good idea of what else would be needed? Yeah, I think you're right. thanks, -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
