Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > > I rebased the most recent patchset to 2.6.33, and pushed to > ckpt-v19-rc2.10. only x86-32 is (lightly) tested. > > it does not include patches from 1/27 and on. working on it > now. > > please review: > > * arch-specific parts that I didn't screw up anything. > btw, I moved checkpoint code from mm/ to kernel/ > > * [dan] network: net/checkpoint.c now uses sock_alloc_file(); > there may or may not be a leak of sock_hold(). > > * [serge] selinux now auto-generates some include files, see > the changes to classmap.h > > Oren. For x86-64, I needed the following patch. With this patch, only the fileio and futex tests failed. Suka is looking into the fileio failure - Matt you might check the futex tests on whatever arch you have available... For s390, I of course still need "fix 31-bit s390 checkpoint/restart wrappers" for compile with CONFIG_COMPAT to succeed. -serge >From 983e6674a72f0f911caddb3304c5d6a8e2e5d354 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:35:15 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] fix x86-64 checkpoint and restart syscall numbers Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_64.h | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_64.h index fbac07d..17bacfd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_64.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_64.h @@ -665,9 +665,9 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_perf_event_open, sys_perf_event_open) __SYSCALL(__NR_recvmmsg, sys_recvmmsg) #define __NR_eclone 300 __SYSCALL(__NR_eclone, stub_eclone) -#define __NR_checkpoint 300 +#define __NR_checkpoint 301 __SYSCALL(__NR_checkpoint, stub_checkpoint) -#define __NR_restart 301 +#define __NR_restart 302 __SYSCALL(__NR_restart, stub_restart) #ifndef __NO_STUBS -- 1.6.0.6 _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
