Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Balbir Singh
> <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Friday 22 January 2010 05:03 PM, william wrote:
>>
>>> Balbir Singh wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Friday 22 January 2010 11:04 AM, william wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hello list
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a question about how i can limit the cpu for a firefox process on
>>>>> a terminal server.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have 150 firefox processes running on a terminalserver but there are
>>>>> always people who take more cpu when they use flash or java.
>>>>> Some firefox processes take sometimes about 50 percent cpu time.
>>>>> Is there a way to give all firefox processes equal cpu shares so that
>>>>> other people who are using firefox for research have no issues (slow
>>>>> responding scrolling and menu) because there are a few firefox
>>>>> processes eating all the cpu time?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Are these running on behalf of different users? You can always create a
>>>> good hiearchy and organize. FAIR_USER scheduler option is going away
>>>> soon. Some more context on the firefox applications and whose behalf
>>>> they are running on, etc would help.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The terminal server only hosts firefox processes for different users
>>> (user is only allowed to login once) to provide internet access in a
>>> secure way.
>>>
>>> So i have 150 firefox processes for different users. So i cannot set one
>>> group, I have to put all those processes in a separate container if i
>>> get it right?
>>>
>> If the kernel is compiled with fair users then you are set, but that
>> option might go away soon.
>>
>
> I have already posted a patch to remove it, and it will go away in the
> next release of the kernel
>
>
>> Yes, putthing them all in their own cgroup is
>> the best option. This can be done easily using libcgroup tools.
>>
>>
>
> Right, libcgroup already has the ability to sort on the basis of
> username and process name. You should be able to use that. Though it
> might be impractical at the moment since you will need to list all the
> usernames/groups in a configuration file.
>
So then i would have to create a config file with 65k users in it :(
Would it be possible to setup a specific application in libcgroup, so
that the libcgroup will create a container for that firefox process?
say something like:
#applicationgroup firefox {
# perm {
# task {
# application = /usr/bin/firefox;
# gid = users;
# }
# }
# cpu {
# cpu.shares = 10;
# }
#}
so every firefox process started should get the same cpu cycles.
And if i understood it correctly a process can take as much cpu cycles
as he want till the hard limit , if another process requests more cycles
and has not reached his soft limit then the process which is already
over the softlimit will be cut back?
> Thanks,
> Dhaval
>
Thank you for helping.
With kind regards
William
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
