Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx):
>
> I can't recall a convincing reason why restore_{thread,cpu}() should
> run so late, or in particular after restore_task_objs().
>
> I think the original motivation was to avoid the point-of-no-return
> at a very early stage. However this is only useful for self-restart.
>
> If we ever want self-restart to fail gracefully should something go
> wrong, we should be prepared to undo any changes to the process -
> on the error path. While not beyond reach, it isn't a top priority.
>
> Does calling restore_{thread,cpu}() earlier solve the problem ?
Yes, it does.
> BTW, this is also relevant for x86-64...
and also 31-bit s390
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
