Re: [PATCH] [RFC] checkpoint/restart timerfd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 04:49:35PM -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> Support checkpoint/restart of timers specified via timerfd. Checkpoint
> essentially does the timerfd_gettime() syscall and saves the expired flags
> and tick count. This ensures there will be no lost expirations/ticks
> between checkpoint restart.
> 
> This should largely work as expected since the time returned from gettime
> is always relative.
> 
> However, like any time-sensitive state, timerfds set with TFD_TIMER_ABSTIME
> may expire/tick at the "wrong time" because that time has long since passed.
> Short of introducing time namespaces there's almost nothing that can be done
> to checkpoint these uses of timerfd. Would it make more sense to mark timerfds
> which were (re)set with TFD_TIMER_ABSTIME and refuse to checkpoint them rather
> than deliver a "best-effort" expiration/tick?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> --
> NOTE: Compiles, untested.
> ---
>  fs/timerfd.c                   |  113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----

Argh. Missed the "restore" path which requires installing a handler for
these files in checkpoint/file.c. Fixed.

I also switched to __s64 values to keep the times in nanoseconds rather
than a timespec analog. This makes it more similar to the code in
checkpoint/signal.c (found this when looking for pieces to share in the
itimer checkpoint code).

Cheers,
	-Matt Helsley
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux