> + parent_tid_ptr = (int *)kca.parent_tid_ptr; > + child_tid_ptr = (int *)kca.child_tid_ptr; > + > + stack_size = (unsigned long)kca.child_stack_size; > + child_stack = (unsigned long)kca.child_stack_base; > + if (child_stack) > + child_stack += stack_size; Should this calculation not be of the form: child_stack = arch_dependent_alignment(child_stack + stack_size - 1) ? Is overflow a concern? Same questions apply to the x86 version. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
