Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | Hi, | | What happened to eclone() or clonex() ? Well, TBH, I don't know exactly why clone3() sucks - when there are more than two flavors of a call, numbers maybe the easiest to suffix. But if it sucks bc its cryptic about the nature of the extension, then eclone(), clonex() or even clone_extended() are about as descriptive as clone3() IMHO. Given the discussion about ckpt v. checkpoint, I would like to go with a descriptive name. Sukadev _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
