* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-10-27 09:03:11]: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:15:29 -0700 > Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > cgroup subsystems may find the O_APPEND and O_NONBLOCK flags useful > > in determining the way they handle writes. For now only pass these > > flags through the write_string op. > > > > A subsequent patch will make use of the O_NONBLOCK flag in the > > cgroup freezer write_string op. > > > > Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Nathan Lynch <ntl@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > (Cc'ing mem controller maintainers in case they find this useful..) > > Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hmm, maybe useful if we decided to add memory.drop_memory or some... > But now, we have no plan to add backup thread(for asynchronous job). > or some trylock ops. > Anyway, no objection from me if you want this. > I see no issues as well, but no use at the moment right away. -- Balbir _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
