On Wed 2009-10-21 10:37:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > +struct clone_struct {
> > > + u64 flags;
> > > + u64 child_stack;
> >
> > u64 seems wrong on 32 bit platforms. ulong?
>
> That would make it incompatible between 64 bit kernels and
> 32 bit user space, requiring a wrapper. Better leave it at u64.
Ok.
> > > + If a pid in the @pids list is 0, the kernel will assign the next
> > > + available pid in the pid namespace, for the process.
> > > +
> > > + If a pid in the @pids list is non-zero, the kernel tries to assign
> > > + the specified pid in that namespace. If that pid is already in use
> > > + by another process, the system call fails with -EBUSY.
> > ...
> > > + On failure, clone3() returns -1 and sets 'errno' to one of following
> > > + values (the child process is not created).
> >
> > Inconsistent with above. Syscalls really return -ERRCODE, errno is
> > glibc magic.
>
> Quite the opposite is true.
Well, it is still inconsistent. Half the docs talks -ERRCODE, half
talks -1/errno=ERRCODE.
> > > + pid_t pids[] = { 77, 99 };
> > > + struct clone_struct cs;
> > > +
> > > + cs.flags = (u64) SIGCHLD;
> > > + cs.child_stack = (u64) setup_child_stack();
> > > + cs.nr_pids = 2;
> > > + cs.parent_tid = 0LL;
> > > + cs.child_tid = 0LL;
> > > +
> > > + rc = syscall(__NR_clone3, &cs, pids);
> >
> > Hmm, is there reason why pids are not at the end of struct
> > clone_struct? Passing most parameters in special structure, then pids
> > separately is strange...
>
> I suggested doing that, it's a lot easier to handle fixed length data
> structures than an array at the end.
You could still put the something * pids at the end of (fixed length)
structure.
(Not that I agree with the argument, pid array is variable-length,
anyway, and inlining it at the end of structure should not make code
more complex).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
