Quoting Sukadev Bhattiprolu (sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > H. Peter Anvin [hpa@xxxxxxxxx] wrote: > | > > | > Except we can't use clone2() because it conflicts on ia64. Care to propose > | > a name you would prefer? > > Yes, I am running out of ideas :-) > > How about clone64_with_pids() ? - hope we don't need a 65th clone-flag :p Well, maybe accept that adding more flags will still require a new syscall, and call this clone_with_pids(), and only take a single 32-bit flags field? Or, go back to clone_extended(). -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
