Quoting Dan Smith (danms@xxxxxxxxxx): > OL> IMHO this is over-engineered. This way, you place net-related > OL> knowledge in ckpt_ctx_free(), instead of isolating that sort of > OL> smarts under net/ subdir. I'd rather see the clean-up logic near > OL> the "litter" logic, so to speak. > > Well, I still need to clean up the list after the deferqueue has run, > so something has to go into ckpt_ctx_free() to do that. I can make it > a specific call like ckpt_sock_cleanup_listening() or something, but > that will still need to go in checkpoint.h so I can call it from > ctx_free()... Heh, but that sounds like over-engineering :) -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
