Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] Add c/r support for connected INET sockets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:34 -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
> JD> Yep.  It sort of messes up your separation between layers, though.
> 
> In what way?  It's just this:

I just meant that you're peeking into the checkpointed sk data before
you create the new sk.  In so much of your code, you manage to restore
structs as a whole, without peeking first.

> Which seems like a why-didn't-I-do-that-in-the-first-place sort of
> thing...   Am I missing something?

Not anything that I see.  

  --  John

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux