On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 20:19 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > I'm not too worried about the "single IO producer" scenarios, and it > looks like (from a quick look) that most of your numbers are within some > expected noise levels. It's the more complex mixes that are likely to > cause a bit of a stink, but lets worry about that later. One quick thing > would be to read eg 2 or more files sequentially from disk and see how > that performs. Hm. git(s) should be good for a nice repeatable load. Suggestions? > If you could do a cleaned up version of your overload patch based on > this: > > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=1d2235152dc745c6d94bedb550fea84cffdbf768 > > then lets take it from there. I'll try to find a good repeatable git beater first. At this point, I only know it helps with one load. -Mike _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
