Re: Review: Can we move init_restart_ctx() up ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> 
> Would it be easier/cleaner if we initialized the restart ctx soon after
> allocating it ? Looks like we already have the information we need at that
> point.
> 
> That way, do_restart() won't need the 'pid' parameter and we anyway use
> the 'if(ctx)' check to test for the coordinator.

I put the {checkpoint,restart}-related work in {checkpoint,restart}.c,
and leave sys.c "neutral".

I also like the symmetry between do_checkpoint() and do_restart() :p

> BTW, can we move the '->active_pid = -1' in init_restart_ctx() to
> ckpt_ctx_alloc() itself ?

@active_pid is specific to restart, that's why I initialize it there.

Oren.

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux