Re: [PATCH 00/80] Kernel based checkpoint/restart [v18]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx):
> Dan Smith wrote:
>> The header file makes it pretty clear what is going on, 
> Certainly for you.

If you're worried about hooking lxc-restart up and that
being a mess, i have said that as soon as something hits -mm,
I will hook up lxc-restart.  I do agree, the userspace code
would be much simpler if we didn't need to do all of the
process tree creation in userspace :)  I *would* prefer if
we didn't have to parse the image in userspace.  But the
moment it was decided that portability across kernel versions
woudl be done by having userspace process the image, we lost
that fight.

-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux