On 09/09/2009 11:03 AM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> C90 or C99 below should work. Is it ok to use a data structure that is
> not in C89 ?
>
C89 is the same as C90 (C89 refers to the ANSI standard, C90 to the ISO
standard, but they're functionally identical.)
> BTW, would it work if we defined
>
> struct pid_set {
> u64 pids;
> int num_pids;
> }
>
> where ->pids can be still be a pointer ? The data structure would
> have the same size on all architectures.
>
It would rather suck in terms of usability, though.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
