Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Casey Schaufler (casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > >> Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >> >>> Quoting Casey Schaufler (casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): >>> >>> >>>> Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> This patch, for debugging only, introduces a silly admin-controlled >>>>> 'policy version' for smack. By default the version is 1. An >>>>> admin (with CAP_MAC_ADMIN) can change it by echoing a new value >>>>> into /smack/version. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> The scheme you have suggested is just one step off of completely >>>> acceptable for real. More detail below, but if you make the "version" >>>> a string instead of a number I'm happy with it. In particular, a >>>> string that would itself be a valid Smack label makes everything >>>> really simple. >>>> >>>> >>> Presumably at many sites the version will be a unique string not >>> used as a label anywhere else. That's ok? >>> >>> >>> >>>> It would take me a few days, but if you're not in a real hurry or >>>> you're lazier than I am (yeah, right) I could provide a patch that >>>> does it. Or, if I haven't been completely incomprehensible, you >>>> could do a revision. >>>> >>>> >>> Heh, I'm in no hurry. I'll mark this to do midway next week, if >>> you haven't gotten around to it first. Thanks! >>> >>> >> I hate to be a bother, but what tree are you basing these patches on? >> Suspect that I missed a round of patches along the way, and can't apply >> the ones I do have. >> > > Sorry, the c/r tree is at: > > git://git.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/pub/git/linux-cr.git > The four patches from 08/28 (2-5) and the two from 09/03 are not happy applying to this tree. Am I missing a patch? _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
