Quoting Casey Schaufler (casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Casey Schaufler (casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > > I know, I know, I should come up with a better name. But while > > an selinux context would be > > > > root_u:root_r:root_t > > > > the blob I have to checkpoint for a task would perhaps be > > > > root_u:root_r:root_t:::null:::null::null:::user_u:serge_r:serge_t:::null > > > > What you really want is a textual representation of the security blob > if I read this correctly. Exactly. > Seems like you could call this either a > "blob string" or a "context collection" or a "checkpoint string". Object security state? "Foss" for full object security state? I suspect I'll default to blob... -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
