Hi Ryo 2009/8/27 Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Hi Dong-Jae, > > # I've added dm-devel to Cc:. > > Dong-Jae Kang <baramsori72@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Ryo > > > > I attached new test result file(ioband-partition-based-evaluation.xls)in > > this mail. > > Thanks for your great job. > > > In this time, it is not virtualization environment. > > I evaluated partition-based use cases before I do it in vitualization > > environment. > > because I think the two cases are smilar each other. > > > > The detailed information about the evaluation can be referred in attached > > file. > > > > If you have any questions or comments after examine it, > > please give me your opinion. > > I would like to know the throughput without dm-ioband in your > environment. Because the total throughput of range-bw policy is > 8000KB/s, which means the device has a capability to perform over > 8000KB/s, but the total throughput of weight policy is lower than > the range-bw policy. In my environment, there is no significant > difference in average throughput between with and without dm-ioband. > I ran fio in the way described in your result file. Here are the > results of my environment. The throughputs were calculated from > "iostat -k 1" outputs. > > buffered write test > Avg. throughput [KB/s] > w/o ioband w/ioband > sdb2 14485 5788 > sdb3 12494 22295 > total 26979 28030 > OK, good comments. I omitted the total bandwidth of the evaluation system. I will reply to you about it tomorrow after I check and re-test it again. > > Thanks, > Ryo Tsuruta > Thank you for comments. -- Best Regards, Dong-Jae Kang _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
