On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:47:57 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-08-24 15:58:35]: > > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:17:06 +0200 > > Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > how about memsw_limit for swap? :> > > > > > I am looking for swap usage statistics from cgroup right now from > > > > > memcontrol.c :) but as you did the idea is good and should be add to > > > > the > > > > > kernel and lxc-tools :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, why meminfo is necessary ? For cheating top/free/... etc ? > > > > > > Many servers use that info to control the use of resources. For example, they do not span any more server processes if memory is low. > > > > > > If you do not have that info correct, all those programs fails (they try to allocate much more resources than available). > > > > > > > Hm, duplicating information for keeping binary compatibility for apps ? > > What other stat does ? > > For example, > > - load average > > - cpu usage %user, %sys, %iowait, etc.. > > - fork-per-sec > > > > One difficulty I think of is that memcg's limit-usage doesn't means "free". > > But, hmm, showing "meminfo" in popular/user-friendly format is not very bad. > > Balbir, how do you think ? > > > > Sorry, I've missed the context and unable to follow the discussion. > IIUC, the request is to show per-container statistics? > per-container "meminfo" i.e. the same format information as "meminfo". (Then, duplicating information of memory.stat") Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers