OL> I figured that if we called a sock_create() for a type that isn't OL> supported by checkpoint/restart, we will catch it down the code by OL> testing sock->ops->restore. That way, I don't need to "teach" OL> sock_file_restore() about socket types and protocols. Okay, yeah I suppose so. In that case, why even have the check? certainly sock_create() checks that somewhere down the line, right? OL> Do you see any reason why it should work ? The only difference OL> (for afunix) between dgram and seqpacket is the requirement that OL> the socket be connected - see unix_seqpacket_sendmsg(). Not for AF_UNIX, no. I just said I hadn't tested it :) -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: danms@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
