On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Benjamin Blum<bblum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For genericness, I'll have the down_read and up_read on the lock in > do_fork() directly (instead of cgroup_fork and cgroup_post_fork as it > is in this version of the patch). rather, I'll keep the read-locking in the cgroup functions for now and any future thing that wants the lock too can move them to fork.c, and a comment to that effect. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
