On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:24:46PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 08:19 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > So yes, putting a rwsem in there sounds fine, you're already bouncing > > > it. > > > > If the critical section is small, is an rwsem really better than a > > straight mutex? > > Well, my understanding was that it needed to surround much, if not all, > of clone(). That's a rather large bit of code. That would indeed justify an rwsem! ;-) Thanx, Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
