Quoting Dan Smith (danms@xxxxxxxxxx): > SH> Does this re-use of tmp make sense? (It only would if > SH> dev_alloc_skb() did a generic prealloc for any subsequent > SH> skb_clone() which i don't think is the case) > > No, this is cruft. > > SH> Also, do you need any kind of lock on the queue to make this walk > SH> safe, or do ensure below (sorry i'm slow and haven't gotten there) > SH> that all tasks with an open fd for either end of this sock are > SH> frozen? > > Hmm, it seems that holding the lock while processing the queue isn't > really the way to go. Perhaps comparing the pid of the other end of > the socket against the list in the context is best? I don't understand. Which pid? _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
