Re: [PATCH 3/5] Add common socket helpers to unify the security hooks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Dan Smith (danms@xxxxxxxxxx):
> SH> My only concern here is whether 0 should be passed in by the
> SH> caller?  (Not sure, just wondering)
> 
> I just figured I'd split up the 0/1 case into getname and getpeer,
> mirroring the libc calls.  I don't care either way.

Oh, sounds sensible.

-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux