On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Serge E. Hallyn<serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is probably a stupid idea, but... what about having zero > overhead at clone(), and instead, at cgroup_task_migrate(), > dequeue_task()ing all of the affected threads for the duration of > the migrate? That doesn't sound too unreasonable, actually - it would certainly simplify things a fair bit. Is there a standard API for doing that? dequeue_task() itself doesn't really look like a public API. I guess that the task freezer would be one way to accomplish this? I can imagine that the set of people who'd complain about the latency hit when migrating with your solution would be smaller than the people who'd complain about the increased overhead in the normal clone case. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
