On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 14:26 -0700, Benjamin Blum wrote: > This method looks to be a compromise between Andrew's proposed > generalized solution ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/2/518 ) and the > current quick-fix. The problem with it is that it'll require a layer > between whoever's using the array and managing the list structs (for > the case where we need to chain multiple blocks together), and if > we're going to put forth enough effort for that, we may as well go > ahead and write up a generalized kernel-wide library to fix this size > problem globally. This "Andrew" guy seems to know what he's talking about. :) We've also got a set of pgarrs (struct page arrays) in the checkpoint/restart code that would make use of something generic like this. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
