On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 10:28 -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:25 PM, KAMEZAWA > Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My point is > > - More PIDs, More time necessary to read procs file. > > Right now, many pids => impossible to read procs file due to kmalloc > failure. (This was always the case with cpusets too). So using kmalloc > in those cases is a strict improvement. How big were those allocations that were failing? The code made it appear that order-2 (PAGE_SIZE*4) allocations were failing. That's a bit lower than I'd expect the page allocator to start failing. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
