On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:25 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My point is > - More PIDs, More time necessary to read procs file. > This patch boost it ;) Seems like "visit this later again" ,or FIXME patch. > > Thanks, > -Kame Indeed. You'll notice the TODOs in the code here referring to the discussion of a possible dynamic array system in the previous thread. This is simply a correctness patch that aims to keep performance as good as it can for the current approach. (Kame, forgive the double-post; forgot to reply-all the first time) - Ben _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
