OL> I don't recall such a conclusion. Maybe this will lead you to a pointer in your IRC logs: Jun 11 13:51:53 * orenl in favor of dansmith OL> I argued that it it's kernel's job. I suppose we agree that such OL> pathnames should always be unlinked - so it isn't policy based. OL> Therefore, I don't see a good reason to have userspace scan the OL> checkpoint image data just to find such sockets and make them OL> disappear ... I'm not really interested in arguing about it again, so I'll just put it in and move on. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: danms@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
