Li Zefan wrote: > Gui Jianfeng wrote: >> Li Zefan wrote: >>> CC: container list >>> >>> Gui Jianfeng wrote: >>>> Currently, /proc/cgroups outputs is fairly ugly as following, >>>> #subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled >>>> cpuset 0 1 1 >>>> debug 0 1 1 >>>> ns 0 1 1 >>>> >>>> indent it in a good-looking way. >>>> #subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled >>>> cpuset 0 1 1 >>>> debug 0 1 1 >>>> ns 0 1 1 >>>> >>> But if there's a subsystem with name length >= 8, >>> it won't be aligned properly.. >> Yeap, but there isn't such a case at least by now. >> > > This is not a good reason. > > We'll probably have such a subsystem. Actually there's a > proposed subsystem named "maxdepth" which is of length 8. > > See: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/1/581 yes, this is a case. But at least others can be aligned properly, right? Anyway, please ignore it if you don't like this change. > > > > -- Regards Gui Jianfeng _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
