On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:19:30AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Louis Rilling<Louis.Rilling@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I did not see anything preventing two hierarchies from having the same > > (non empty) name. > > If you try to mount with a name that matches an already existing > hierarchy, and you leave the subsystem options empty or give options > that match the existing mount, then you get the original mount; if you > specify conflicting options you get an error. I don't think the code > will let you have two hierarchies with the same non-empty name. Ah, true. Don't know why I concluded that, even after having read the relevant portion of the code. Sorry for the noise. Louis -- Dr Louis Rilling Kerlabs Skype: louis.rilling Batiment Germanium Phone: (+33|0) 6 80 89 08 23 80 avenue des Buttes de Coesmes http://www.kerlabs.com/ 35700 Rennes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
