On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:56:28 -0700 Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:48 PM, KAMEZAWA > Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hmm, do we need to this "info" file as subsys ? How about making this as > > default file set ? (if there are users.) > > > > That would certainly be possible, and would be an alternative to > having multi-bindable subsystem support. > > The advantage of adding multi-bindable subsystems is that you can > avoid bloating the core cgroups code, by putting individual small > cgroups features in their own code modules, and you get to decide at > mount time which features are actually mounted; if they were part of > the core cgroups files, then there would either need to be special > mount options for each separate feature, or else no way to pick which > features were mounted on each hierarchy. > Sure, thanks. -Kame > Paul > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
