Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 08:51:16PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: >> * Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> [2009-06-19 16:37:18]: >> >> > >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Here is the V5 of the IO controller patches generated on top of 2.6.30. >> [snip] >> >> > Testing >> > ======= >> > >> >> [snip] >> >> I've not been reading through the discussions in complete detail, but >> I see no reference to async reads or aio. In the case of aio, aio >> presumes the context of the user space process. Could you elaborate on >> any testing you've done with these cases? >> > > Hi Balbir, > > So far I had not done any testing with AIO. I have done some just now. > Here are the results. > > Test1 (AIO reads) > ================ > Set up two fio, AIO read jobs in two cgroup with weight 1000 and 500 > respectively. I am using cfq scheduler. Following are some lines from my test > script. > > =================================================================== > fio_args="--ioengine=libaio --rw=read --size=512M" AIO doesn't make sense without O_DIRECT. Cheers, Jeff _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
