Paul Menage wrote: > It just struck me that this patch broke access to the tasks file in > the presence of multiple pid namespaces, since the pids in the cached > pid array are always from the namespace of the last process to open Hmm, so we have to keep namespace in mind whenever we deal with pid.. > the file. Since I suspect no-one uses pid namespaces in production > environments this probably isn't a show-stopper, but to be technically > correct we need to maintain a list of cached pid arrays keyed by pid > namespace. (This list should generally be very short, usually of > length 1). > Sounds feasible. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
