Re: [PATCH] checkpoint/restart of robust futex lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx):
>>
>> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>> IIUC (from Matt and Dave), after this patch, you might need something
>>> for PI futexes, but otherwise non-contended cases "just work" because
>>> there is no kernel involvement.
>> That's what I thought. But I also thought that a checkpoint would
>> fail anyway as soon as it hits the futex-file-descriptor. Or am I
>> missing something ?
> 
> Yes - FUTEX_FD no longer exists :)

Heh .. need to catch up !

Oren.

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux